After Germany’s defeat in WWII, the Nuremberg and later trials were organized primarily for political purposes rather than to dispense impartial justice. Wears War regularly brings to you quotes from the many fine men and women who were openly appalled by the trials. All of these people were highly respected and prominent in their field, at least until they spoke out against the trials.
The Legally-Flawed Nuremberg “War Crimes Trials” Did Not “Prove” the Holocaust
By Peter Winter,
The Holocaust storytellers like to claim that the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials “proved” the mass murder of Jews in open court.
In reality, nothing of the sort was ever proved, and the main charges did not relate at all to the alleged mass murder of Jews.
Below: The Nuremberg Trials have been dismissed by all honest legal experts as a farce. People were charged on hearsay evidence, and for “crimes” such as “waging aggressive war.” The Soviets, who had invaded Poland, Finland, and the Baltic States earlier in the war, sat on the judges’ panel and sentenced German leaders to death for invading Poland.
The actual indictments at the main Nuremberg Trials were as follows:
“1. Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of a crime against peace.
“2. Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace.
“3. War crimes.
“4. Crimes against humanity.”
In normal legal systems, it is an established legal principle that no one can be charged for a crime that was not a crime at the time the act was committed—in other words, that no one can be charged retrospectively for an act which was not classified as a crime at the time when it was committed.
The Nuremberg Trial indictments are clearly a major abrogation of this principle, a fact which led the famous British General Bernard Montgomery, victor of the Battle of El Alamein, to remark with reference to the Nuremberg Trials that he no longer wished to lead any armies because it had now “become a crime to lose a war.”
The legal basis of these main charges aside, the entire Nuremberg Trials process was from the very beginning a mockery because one of the judging parties—the Soviet Union—had, for the first two years of the war, been an ally of Nazi Germany!
For the German leaders to be charged with “waging aggressive war” and “planning, initiating, and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace”—and then to be found guilty thereof by judges who included Soviets, is one of the most extreme acts of twisted irony ever seen on the international legal stage.
If Germany could be charged for invading Poland on September 1, 1939 (the main charge of “waging aggressive war”), then why were the Soviets not charged for invading Poland on September 17, 1939—after concluding a secret deal with Nazi Germany over the matter? Why was the Soviet Union not charged with “waging aggressive war” over its invasion of neutral Finland on November 30, 1939? In addition, nothing was said of the seizure of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia by the Soviet Union in June 1940.
The irony of the Soviets sitting in judgment over the Germans on charges of “waging aggressive war” was but only one of the many travesties of justice at the Nuremberg Trials.
The third charge, that of “war crimes” was equally outrageous. According to the definition used at the trials, a war crime was “a serious violation of the laws and customs of war.” The mass Allied bombing of German civilians—started by Britain (with the Germans only retaliating after months of nightly bombing)—was certainly a violation of the “laws and customs of war,” as were the mass rapes of German women carried out by Soviet soldiers in 1945.
However, these same Allies saw fit to put German leaders on trial for a handful of outrageous acts committed by underlings—none of which were ever sanctioned at senior level, unlike the bombing of civilians, an idea which came from Winston Churchill himself.
The fourth charge, “Crimes against humanity” was vaguely defined by the Nuremberg Trials as acts “committed in execution of, or in connection with, the aggressive war, and therefore constituted crimes against humanity” (Judgment: The Law Relating to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, Judgment of the International Military Tribunal). In other words, none of the defendants at Nuremberg were specifically charged with the mass gassing of Jews or the operation of extermination camps. They were only alleged to have been “generally responsible.”
As a result it is untrue to claim that the Nuremberg Trials “proved the Holocaust.”
Even much of the “evidence” produced at those trials has long since been accepted as false. A reading of some of the incredible evidence presented as evidence borders on the laughable if it were not so illustrative of the outrageousness of the “trials.” By way of example, some of the “evidence” submitted to Nuremberg under the “crimes against humanity” charge included wild claims of “Jewish soap,” “shrunken heads,” “lampshades,” “gassing by steam”, execution by “electrocution” socks made of human hair, and even an astonishing affidavit by a “survivor” which claimed that the SS had killed Jews in one of the Polish camps with a “pedal-driven brain-bashing machine.”
All of this was accepted at face value during the court proceedings, even though they have long since been dismissed as lies by all serious historians.
WEARS WAR has moved to a new website! 
The time to deal with the so called death camps Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor during the Nürenberg Trials, only took an measly 15 minutes from just one “witness”. It’s astonishing, people still take these “trials” seriously. 20.02.2019, 14:14, “WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2” <comment-reply@wordpress.com>:wearswar posted: “After Germanyâs defeat in WWII, the Nuremberg and later trials were organized primarily for political purposes rather than to dispense impartial justice. Wears War regularly brings to you quotes from the many fine men and women who were openly appalled by”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Just a few examples of the self-serving ALL-LIES hypocrisy and illegality of these farcical show ‘trials’ which should be more accurately referred to as the No Trials.
Peter Winter’s 7th edition of his book linked above is FREE online due to the attempt of the (((Book Burners))) to silence him and censor his information.
Just as outrageous today are the farcical German Courts sentencing an admirable 90 year old gentle lady URSULA HAVERBECK (and many other brave individuals!) to 2 years imprisonment for simply raising questions regarding scientifically unsustainable claims about so-called gas chambers.
LikeLiked by 4 people
” . . . and even an astonishing affidavit by a “survivor” which claimed that the SS had killed Jews in one of the Polish camps with a “pedal-driven brain-bashing machine.” ”
That one really takes the cake or prize. This would be an incredibly ineffective means to “liquidate” or exterminate large numbers of persons, and a means that would likely cause many problems for those charged with using it. This “astonishing affidavit” is gruesome, macabre, bizarre and must have been used for its clearly sensationalist value.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Don’t laugh. My aunt Ilse told me she operated one of these pedal powered, brain bashing machines at Buchenwald. She said candidates for operating the Nadzee’s diabolical death machines were chosen from top women cyclist, like the dutch Mien van Bree.
When an evil Nadzee overlord castigated my aunt her slow performance of bashing the brains out of a mere two hundred Jews every five minuets, she shot back, “I’m pedaling fast as I can boss!”
The evil Nadzee overlord glared at her and said, “you can be replaced by an electric motor you know.” Later she laughed, smoked and drank fine liqueurs as she unloaded the bodies of gassed Jews from pedal powered gas vans.
If you don’t believe me, you can read it for yourself in “The Jews’ big book of Holocaust History – History that never happened, even though it did.” To date six million copies have been sold.
The most sought after examples are the rare volumes personally autographed by Ann Frank who used a ball point pen to sign her name.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, where can I get a copy of this wonderful book?
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is about time to call the Nuremberg trials a revanchist show trial of the worst kind.
The trumped up charges and fabricated evidence would make any person in the judicial world flinch. Alfred Jodl was an innocent hanged at the trial and there may be more if we really revisited the laughable proceedings. We should examine the “conspiracy to wage war” charge and apply it to our current and past leaders who got us into illegal wars.
LikeLiked by 3 people
During these show trials, Jodl was even questioned at length over the fact that he had purchased the German equivalent of war bonds during the war. (I read this about 30 years ago in a book entitled 5 Men at Nuremberg. This was a court historian’s work.) Hell, just being a German citizen was a crime against humanity in the eyes of the Jewish run tribunal.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The Nuremberg kangaroo court trials were no different than any other high profile, Soviet “show trial” led by judeocommunist prosecutors who established guilt largely by tortured confession while using the moral imperative to justify allied war crimes. This was standard judeocommunist trickery to vilify their enemies, while validating their criminal system. What is astonishing is how no one seems to make this obvious connection.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on THE FOURTH REICH CENTURY.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Majority of Euro Jews did not die in the gas chambers, they were shot by the select German auxiliary police units in the east and their Ukrainian collaborating party.
For a more detailed information read Ordinary Men by Christopher Browning.
LikeLike
Nobody, Jew and Gentile alike died in a homicidal gas chamber during the second world war unless they were killed in the United States as America is the only country that kills with cyanide-gas. The Jewish version of the Second World War is imbecilic nonsense.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No, Candice – that is not correct. Yes, I am sure you saw the “photographs” of these terrible actions. Take note that Stalin evacuated the Jews in eastern Poland and in western Soviet Russia who were in the path of the rapidly advancing German armies. These Jews were loaded on to cattle cars and many of them died in transit deep into the interior of Russia. It was these photos that were then claimed later to be of German atrocities. This is true also for so many of these mass shootings along hastily dug ravines and burial pits. Photos were doctored. (The late Eustace Mullins was one of the first to point this out decades ago.)
Why did Stalin do this? Per Mullins, it was because he knew the Jews would likely aid the Germans. Jews have always welcomed and aided invaders against the host society in which they lived. The Moorish invasion of Spain the early 8rth century was aided by the Jews who opened the gates of fortified cities to the invaders. There are other examples. Jewish behavioral traits do not change over the centuries.
Believe as you wish, but the Jews are lying to the world about this holocaust or burnt offering. The true “holocaust” was the Allied terror bombing of the cities in Germany and in Japan. BTW, Mullins also instructs us as to the real reason why the Allies ignored the peace overtures of Japan in the late Spring and early Summer of 1945. They wanted to test the Jewish hell-bomb (aka the atomic bomb) on humans. The bomb was not ready to be dropped until August that year. The Allies were the mass murderers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I’ve read in other discourses that a great number of deaths in concentration camps were also attributable to allied bombings which disrupted supplies of medicine and food causing disease and starvation.
My main concern with the subject is that Britain The USA and Russia are guilty of all the atrocities charged to Germany, such as Genocide, Illegal medical experiments on humans also persecution of minorities including forced sterilisation. Also Israel with its very short history has already committed many crimes.
75yrs is far too long for these glass houses to stand unchallenged and it feels like a change is coming, unfortunately even a cursory knowledge of human history warns that this change is probably for the worse.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Candice Smith, Christopher Browning is a Court Historian and you should really not take the man too seriously. Browning like hack-writer Richard Evans keeps publishing because they make the publishers happy who keep the Zionist Oligarchs happy. The English language publishing world is about 90% Jewish run. I’m not saying there are no honorable and truthful Jewish publishers but when it comes to the Holocaust narrative, common sense is always thrown out the window. If you want a more truthful history of that period, I would start with David Hoggan’s, ‘The Forced War, When Peaceful Revision Failed, anything by David Irving but especially ‘Churchill’s War, two volumes, and John Wear’s ‘Germany’s War. You may also be interested in ‘Who Started World War Two,’ by Udo Walendy, and Patrick Buchanans, ‘Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War., though I believe Buchanan is a little too hard on Hitler, considering the man was basically fighting the industrial world.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The banned classic, The Bad War, by Mike King, also is a good work on the period. In it, King questions why has every means of mass indoctrination been harnessed to the task of enforcing only one perspective on the period. Jewish pressure groups succeeded in banning hundreds of taboo books and video documentaries from sale on Amazon in March, 2017. Anything coming from a Jewish owned publishing house on WW2 or about the “holocaust” is suspect and cannot be trusted.
LikeLiked by 3 people
80,000 Jews killed and thrown into the Danube! Sure, why let common sense ruin a ridiculous piece of propaganda? Someone really needs to tell these people, they have no sense of proportion.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, papasha408. What is easier to believe: the outlandish and absurd holocaust narrative that required Jewish psychologists ti invent the idea of a death instinct to account for millions of people to march without incident to homicidal gas chambers, and that a cultured people, the Germans favored and committed exterminations of millions of human beings – or that the absurd official narrative is wartime atrocity propaganda?
After World War One, they had a commission investigate the alleged German atrocities and it was found that these stories or claims were the work of Allied propagandists during the war. No such commission was permitted after the Second World War.
LikeLiked by 2 people
….and the @ 150000 German Jews who worked in all areas of the Wehrmacht inc the Shutzstaffel. OMG 😳 what were they thinking……..
LikeLiked by 1 person