Is believing that “cheerful blond” children are probably “dangerous”, any less crazy than Communist Chairman Mao’s government decreeing that sparrows were symbols of sinister thinking, and therefore to be eradicated?
In 1958 Mao’s Communist government famously declared that “birds are public animals of capitalism” therefore implying (Sparrows in particular) were ideologically dangerous. Sparrows were harassed to death in the millions. The true contribution of the ‘ideological‘ Sparrow was only noticed when their decimation by vilification almost brought them to extinction. Their drastic decline in numbers contributed to the great famine that killed tens of millions.
In 2016 German mothers were warned that “blond cheerful” ethnic-German children were probably from “right wing” families, therefore implying they are probably ideologically “dangerous” to tolerate and co-exist with. Now, in 2018, the German government has essentially declared that children who wear braids or are athletic are potentially being raised by parents who are “Nazis”.
In the following videos you’ll meet two PC compliant Germans who demonstrate what life is like in this bizarre and claustrophobic climate of suspicion, insinuation and persecution.
Quoted from Breitbart (images and captions added because they won’t ‘go-there’):
A new booklet for daycare workers that claims to help identify “Nazi parents” suggests looking out for girls with braided hair and athletic boys.
The 60-page booklet, entitled Ene, Mene, Muh – And You’re Out! was designed by the far-left “anti-hate” Amadeu Antonio Foundation ,which is headed by former Stasi informant Annette Kahane and based in Berlin with the foreword being written by Social Democrat (SPD) Family Minister Franziska Giffey, Berliner Kurier reports.
Ms Kahane made headlines in 2015 after the German government recruited her and the foundation to scour social media for “xenophobic posts” during the height of the migrant crisis.
Vice-Chairman of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) parliamentary group Nadine Schön slammed the booklet saying the case studies and suggestions were “absurd.”
“If educators should become overseers and correctors of parental convictions, that [crosses a line],” Schön said.
Labelling the practice “parenting espionage” — or spying on parents — the CDU politician criticised the aspects of the booklet that identifies the way children dress or how much physical activity they participate in as being potential signs their parents might be Nazis, saying it does not fit with democracy.
The Amadeu Antonio Foundation defended the booklet claiming that the case studies were based on real-life cases they had witnessed including a girl with braided hair whose parents turned out to be far-right extremists. They also admitted that since the release of the booklet their phones had been slammed with complaints.
The case studies echo research presented by Antifa groups in 2016, which claimed that “Volkisch families,” those who believe in countryside living and traditional German culture and values, posed a threat to Germany.
Antifascist Action group member Olaf Meyer warned of “young couples [who] buy farms and restore them together with their relatives and friends.”
The Amadeu Antonio Foundation has been roundly criticised in the past, not just for Kahane’s former Stasi ties but also for their methods which have been likened to the old East German secret police…
Chasing Sparrows
This young lady discovered wearing braids alarms more than day care workers after the police stop and harass her.
The following interview with Nikolai Der Volksleher is both revealing and disturbing. Informed readers will recognize many of the trends he mentions are also occurring in all western nations, including the Allied nations.
It’s time we recognize that Germany today is the Canary Sparrow In The Coal Mine.
WEARS WAR has moved to a new website! 
Yes, this is coming to a town near you, for sure.
“The true contribution of the ‘ideological‘ Sparrow was only noticed when their decimation by vilification almost brought them to extinction. Their drastic decline in numbers contributed to the great famine that killed tens of millions.”
This is a good example of how dogmatic ideology trumps real world experience for true believers. Mao’s advisors dared not tell him that his collectivization of agriculture and his Great Leap Forward resulted in such a terrible famine. The messengers of bad news could be liquidated on a whim. The failings of his rule must have been due to the work of “counter-revolutionaries”, and thus the world saw the “Cultural Revolution” of the late 1960s in China, with, sorry to say, more killing. The communist orthodoxy cannot be questioned. Reality must somehow be made to conform to its dogmatic assertions regardless of the cost in lives and needless suffering. (And, communist regimes have been notoriously terrible for the environment and the ecology.) Even today in China, the mythos around Mao persists. If the Chinese ever acknowledge how bloody, evil and cruel he and his regime were it would undercut the legitimacy of the current rulers in Beijing.
Sorry to go off on a tangent. One last item of note is that in Mao’s last couple of years (1974 – 1976), he was effectively an idiot, who was slurping soup and watching old black and white reruns of American children’s cartoons from the 1950s and early 1960s. His dementia was that bad, but none dared to get rid of him.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Its quite outrageous that the German people have been so ‘TAVISTOCKED’ that they put up with all this insanity by a mentally ill group. As Stephen Mitford Goodson revealed, Germany was forced to agree after losing WWII to the ALL LIES taking total control of their communications systems and education systems until 2099 (going from memory) ie from cradle to grave they are relentlessly indoctrinated by escapees from the lunatic asylums.
This interesting interview by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock with released political prison intern, Canadian retiree Monika Schaefer after her abduction by occupied Germany, I highly recommend:
http://eurofolkradio.com/2018/12/08/the-andrew-carrington-hitchcock-show-865-monika-schaefer-how-you-can-help-alfred-schaefer/
In today’s show originally broadcast on December 8 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews Monika Schaefer, for a show entitled, “How YOU Can Help Alfred Schaefer!”
“We discussed: what happened to Monika whilst she attended the Sylvia Stolz trial in January of this year; how Monika was jailed for three and a half months before she was even charged with an offence; how the Canadian Consulate were forbidden from attending Monika’s subsequent trial by the Canadian Government; how Monika’s trial took place alongside her brother Alfred, and appeared to be a secret trial as it was not recorded or documented; the details of the trial which commenced on July 2 and concluded on October 20, yet only 20 court days in total occurred during that three and a half month period; how any statements you make in your defense in a German court during a free speech trial, are regarded as additional offences, which is why Alfred has to go back to court on January 28, 2019 to face charges in relation to what he said in his defense in the original trial; how the letters, cards, and postcards, that Monika received in prison were a lifeline to her; how only letters, cards, or postcards, will reach a prisoner, so DON’T send anything else; the type of content you should put in any correspondence you send to a prisoner in a German jail; how Alfred now has a job in the prison laundry and why; how Gerd Ittner has just been released from prison; the typical timetable of a day in a German Womens’ prison; and many other topics.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Editor’s Comment: Stunning! At the 11:30 minute mark Monika Schaefer mentions there is no audio recording or court stenographer in a German court!
LikeLiked by 2 people
The catholic magazine Culture Wars has the number on the Talmudists.
On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 10:11 AM WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2 wrote:
> wearswar posted: “Is believing that “cheerful blond” children are probably > “dangerous”, any less crazy than Communist Chairman Mao’s government > decreeing that sparrows were symbols of sinister thinking, and therefore to > be eradicated? In 1958 Mao’s Communist government fam” >
LikeLike