Why would a non-violent middle aged Canadian woman released from a German prison be advised to flee Germany immediately by train to return to Canada in 2018? Is this almost the same journey her father survived after being smuggled out of an Eisenhower death camp by an Allied soldier?
Monika’s father was a young German medical student marked for death by deliberate starvation post-WWII. He survived and earned, among many other awards, the Order of Canada in 1976 for service to Canadian, specifically Inuit, health programs and initiatives that saved countless lives. Monika, a violinist, was an active Green Party member. She also ran as a federal Green Party candidate in Alberta’s Yellowhead in 2006, 2008 and 2011.
Without even mentioning her brother Alfred’s plight, and worse, we can all envisage a Hollywood blockbuster thriller movie in the making. Any day now…
Before You Watch The Video Interview Linked Below, Note These Extracts From The Transcript Via Katana17:
Brian Ruhe from “The Brian Ruhe Show” interviewed on November 15, 2018 Monika Schaefer in her first appearance since being released from a German prison. Monika had served 10 months in jail for a five-minute YouTube video in which she gave a belated apology for berating her German mother for not doing something about the “Holocaust“.
Monika: …This judge in our case basically just told us that:
“We proved every single day, what ‘haters’ we are!”
Which was the most bizarre thing I’ve ever heard! … And like I said, I was jubilantly telling my fellow prisoners, how:
“Every single day they’re proving how they’re just defending lies!”
They’re doing bizarre things. They’re not allowing evidence into court. They’re not allowing anything! Any of the request for proof, request for evidence, that we were submitting, that Alfred was submitting, or that I was submitting through my lawyer, or through his lawyer, or himself. They were just denying it! Just denying it, denying it!
“No! We don’t need that! We don’t need that!”
And they were also misinterpreting what was being requested, over and over, and over again. So it really was quite bizarre in that regard.
Monika: …[H]aving been released…. I thought it would be nice to spend a few weeks, or at least a few days, in Germany, after I was released, to visit with relatives…. Anyway, what happened is I had to flee. So I went from prisoner to fugitive! And it’s because I got indications and signals from several directions. This was not just one person telling me:
“Gee Monika, we think it’s dangerous for you to stay in Germany.”
This was several sources giving me the indication that it’s time to get out. I had to flee. So I went from being ten months in a prison cell… to suddenly having to flee!
One was my lawyer. He was the first one to say:
“Look, don’t have a heart attack but you should leave as soon as possible.”
…I would say that for several days, hour after hour, after hour, and through the night, I was travelling by trains to get out of Germany and not fly from Germany. That was the advice also. I was just on a really high level of tension…
…This brings us to the core of the German court system.
The German so-called “justice” system. You cannot defend yourself in a German court of law, because if you defend yourself, by speaking about the very things that you are in prison for, well then you are doing a “new” crime! Like the thing that they call a “crime”, the politically incorrect speech, whatever it is that they threw you in there for like what they threw me in for, was just for speaking, peaceful expression. Never did violence. Never promoted violence. Never did anything like that! Just peacefully talking about how I see the events of World War Two. And they are very different from what we have been taught. So if we defend ourselves in court by talking about those things we do “new” crime in their eyes!
You can watch the full interview on the following links:
If the youtube link is broken please try bitchute:
The full transcript for the interview is available on Katana17 here and has several interesting additions.
Update: Monika Schaefer discusses with Andrew Carrington Hitchcock more aspects of the bizarre trial and the plight of Alfred Schaefer, December 8, 2018.
Editor’s Comment: We wish to alert readers to a special offer by The Barnes Review. An annual subscription to their bi-monthly magazine for only $28.
WearsWar recommends The Barnes Review (TBR) journal to anyone interested in real history. Named after historian Harry Elmer Barnes, the goal of TBR is “to bring history into accord with the facts.”
TBR is necessary because our mass media and educational system often suppress real history and fail to discuss the power of Jews and Zionists in our political system. Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson writes:
THE BARNES REVIEW, in this and most other issues, deals with politically incorrect issues for this reason. It is a disgrace that journalists and professors whose job it is to uncover the inner workings of power are frightened for their jobs and income. This means they will refuse to talk about Zionist power except in the most glowing terms. I for one refuse to bow to this pressure. We must do what the journalistic hack or tenured academic will not: speak truth to power. It is certainly not always “the Jews,” and they certainly do not control “everything”—but sometimes, it sure seems like it.
TBR is unlike any other history magazine on the market. We strongly recommend that our readers subscribe to TBR to learn real history that is suppressed by our controlled media. For more information please read: When Truth Fears Investigation, We Honor The Life Of Ernst Zundel & Those Who Bring History Into Accord With The Facts
This article and video reveal how severely Germany suppresses free speech. You are a criminal if you publicly dispute the official Holocaust story in Germany.
David Icke recently said in a video that he contacted 15 venues in Germany, and all 15 venues refused to allow him to speak. David Icke is not a Holocaust Revisionist, but no one will sponsor his talks in Germany because his views differ too much from mainstream views. Freedom of speech is essentially nonexistent in Germany.
LikeLiked by 2 people
As pointed out here at WearsWar and on other blogs, Germany does not really have its own constitution. The governing charter it has now is the one imposed by the victorious Allies. Thus, it is not so surprising that there is no free speech in Germany today, only the speech that is consonant with the official narrative. Germans must remain forever guilty and ashamed of themselves and their past.
Yet, Germans are hungering for the truth, as forbidden and taboo as it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The German constitution was not written by the occupying forces. But that’s irrelevant anyway, since the limitation of freedom of speech is based on a law from 1871 that was largely adapted to today’s version in 1960 (and a few times later). Nothing to do with Allies.
“Forever guilty”? Do you know any Germans that feel guilty or are ashamed of themselves?
Editor’s Comment: Yes, we do know Germans that feel guilty and ashamed of themselves. We also receive correspondence from Germans thanking us for countering that and allowing them to grieve.
We mentioned a couple here:
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Yes, we do know Germans that feel guilty and ashamed of themselves“ Well I don’t feel guilty and I don’t understand what I should be ashamed of. And I don’t know anybody who does.
Perhaps there are people who confuse commemoration with guilt. Unfortunately you can’t expect that a monstrous crime like the murder of milions of Jews, Gypsies, disabled people etc. should be forgotten. If you accept the glorious aspects of Germany, you also have to accept the bad parts. It’s a single package, there is no cherry-picking.
Guilt can also manifest itself in different ways. For example, Germans paying compensation when they were the victims, or tolerating 90 year old ladies like Ursula Haverbeck being jailed without protest.
They would only do this if they believed they were guilty as you seem to of the so-called Holocaust. Therein lies the problem.
LikeLiked by 2 people
‘Concerned German’ states:
“Unfortunately you can’t expect that a monstrous crime like the murder of milions of Jews……..should be forgotten.”
I would agree if the ‘monstrous crime’ were actually true. But clearly there are some very ‘Concerned Jews’ for the fact that the ‘War Story’ that Hitler gassed 6 million Jews – or any Jews at all – has been scientifically and historically disproved – so is extremely problematic for the LIARS.
So the ‘Concerned Jews’ have to Stop Their Lies being Exposed and the innocence of Hitler, the National Socialists and the German people, from being revealed to the world – the consequences would be ‘monstrous’ for them. For the scale and extent of the Lies in themselves would be a monstrous crime by the Liars committed against the German people, their history, and against the Lies fed to this day to the whole wide world.
Luckily they have control of – the ADL, SPLC, their UN, their international presstitute Media, the central banks, paypuke, book censorship at amazon, all major publishing houses, the German Judiciary and education systems, and the German government (not to mention the European Union parliament, google, facebook, twitter, wikipedia, ytube …..and all American Presidents since at least Woodrow Wilson).
And let’s not forget also, luckily they have all their hundreds, no thousands, of paid hasbara trolls to promote the Lies and to ‘muddy the waters’ and to attack those revealing the actual Facts, and those algorithms!
A to the FICTIONAL ‘Hitler Gassed Six Million Jews fiction novel’.
Luckily for the rest of us, we have access to holocaust hoax books from The Barnes Review, and free online access to holocaust discrediting sources, including an all encompassing source of accurate information discrediting the falsehood –
Peter Winter’s 7th ed. book “The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?”
Peter has very generously made available to all free online the brand new, updated 7th edition, because amazon BANNED it. In it Auschwitz, and every camp, are researched individually and the official narratives examined in accord with scientific fact and historical accuracies, possibilities and impossibilities:
Since you are a Concerned German, and still believe the Fiction Novel to be a True Story, perhaps you might take the opportunity to read it for yourself, assuming the Truth would be of interest to you?
Head of British Psychological Warfare Executive (Propaganda), Victor Cavendish-Bentick in a hand written note, wrote on Aug 27th, 1943,
“We have had a good run for our money with this gas chamber story we have been putting about, but don’t we run the risk eventually we are going to be FOUND OUT AND WHEN WE ARE FOUND OUT THE COLLAPSE OF THAT LIE is going to bring the whole of our psychological warfare with it? So isn’t it rather time now to let it drift off by itself and concentrate on other lines that we are running.”
In Public Record Office Document F0371/34551
(I got this information from the book “Inside the South African Reserve Bank” by Stephen Mitford Goodson – RIP Mr Goodson, You are seriously appreciated for your revelations on the international Zionist bankers)
And finally, from a Jewish intellectual:
“Whereas the Jews around him take it for granted that the goyim on whom they depend for economic, military, and diplomatic support are too stupid ever to figure out what the Jews think about them and say about them behind their backs and plan to do to them when they can, and too sheeplike ever to take effective action if they do figure it out, he worries.
He remembers that the Romans figured it out, and they consequently sacked Jerusalem and ended their cult in Palestine. He remembers that the Germans figured it out, and that’s why he became an involuntary tenant in a concentration camp.
He’s worried that if his fellow Jews continue behaving as they always have, they will get themselves into some really serious trouble — again. ”
Israel Shahak Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3,000 Years
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes, excellent points you make. Watch now as the strengthening nationalistic movements in various European countries (Hungary, Italy, Spain, Poland, etc.) will be smeared as being “anti-Semitic” ahead of the European Parliament elections next May. What a Freudian slip that will be!! Who is behind the drive for globalism and a so-called new world order that they will control?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Icke can speak as much as he likes. He can write web pages, publish a newspaper, organise a demo. But nobody is forced to listen to him, and nobody is forced to sponsor him.
Editor’s Comment: So you proved your point. There was no need for him to be forcibly prevented from speaking in 15 venues as John stated. Those venues could have allowed him to pay to speak to an empty room.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You write: ““Forever guilty”? Do you know any Germans that feel guilty or are ashamed of themselves?”
My response: Yes, I have met many Germans in Dallas who feel guilty about World War II and the alleged Holocaust. I went to a group called the
Goethe Society in Dallas several times with an elderly German lady who lived through World War II. The Germans that I talked to in this group all felt guilty or ashamed of Germany’s actions during World War II.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“forcibly prevented”? The venues decide whom they accept. This has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Again: Icke can say what he wants. While freedom of speech has limitations in Germany that are slightly stricter than in countries like, say, the USA, Icke’s ideas can be freely disseminated.
@WakeyWakey If main perpetrators like Höß, Stangl or Eichmann, and small cogs in the murder machine like Oskar Gröning, convicted in 2015, confirm that hundreds of thousands were killed; if 90-years-old witnesses travel from faraway places to testify; if countless people report that 90% of their families were annihilated, you should be ashamed to claim that they are all liers.
You write: “@WakeyWakey If main perpetrators like Höß, Stangl or Eichmann, and small cogs in the murder machine like Oskar Gröning, convicted in 2015, confirm that hundreds of thousands were killed; if 90-years-old witnesses travel from faraway places to testify; if countless people report that 90% of their families were annihilated, you should be ashamed to claim that they are all liers.”
My response: Rudolph Höss said that more than two and a half million people were exterminated in the Auschwitz gas chambers, and that another 500,000 inmates had died there of other causes. No defender of the Holocaust story today accepts these inflated figures, and other key portions of Höss’s testimony at Nuremberg are widely acknowledged to be untrue.
In 1983 the anti-Nazi book “Legions of Death” by Rupert Butler showed that Sgt. Bernard Clarke and other British officers tortured Rudolf Höss into making his confession. The torture of Höss was exceptionally brutal. Neither Bernard Clarke nor Rupert Butler finds anything wrong or immoral in the torture of Höss. Neither of them seems to understand the importance of their revelations. Bernard Clarke and Rupert Butler prove that Höss’s testimony at Nuremberg was obtained by torture, and is therefore not credible evidence in proving a program of German genocide against European Jewry.
In regard to Stangl, Gröning and Eichmann, as previously stated they could not contest the official Holocaust story to have any chance of being found not guilty in Germany and Israel. Free speech is not allowed in those two countries concerning the so-called Holocaust story.
Many Jews have had the courage to publicly dispute the official Holocaust story. For example, Joseph G. Burg, a Jewish author who wrote several books on the Holocaust story, testified at the 1988 Zündel trial that he had spoken to hundreds of people who had been at Auschwitz-Birkenau when he visited the camp in the fall of 1945. Burg formed the opinion that there were no German extermination camps, the gas chambers had never existed, and there was no plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe.
Joseph Burg also testified at the 1988 Zündel trial that he spoke to hundreds of people who serviced and operated the crematoria, but he could not find anyone who had operated homicidal gas chambers. Burg testified that the crematoria had been established for hygienic purposes as a result of typhus and other diseases. Burg also testified that he attended the Nuremberg trials in 1946 and met Ilya Ehrenburg, who had visited Auschwitz-Birkenau, as well as a Jewish publisher who had been interned in Auschwitz for several years. Both Ehrenburg and the Jewish publisher said they did not see any homicidal gas chambers while at Auschwitz-Birkenau.
We have posted numerous articles on this website concerning the so-called Holocaust. I suggest you read them in order to become better informed on the subject.
LikeLiked by 2 people
More about Höß. I read this on a revisionist web site http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p389_Faurisson.html. Here is what he said about his time in Nürnberg: “Although the conditions in prison were, in every respect, good — I read whenever I had the time, and there was a well stocked library available — the interrogations were extremely unpleasant, not so much physically, but far more because of their strong psychological effect. I cannot really blame the interrogators — they were all Jews.
Psychologically I was almost cut in pieces. They wanted to know all about everything, and this was also done by Jews. “
Poor guy, his interrogations weren’t pleasant. I wonder why he couldn’t blame the interrogators? After all, nothing had happened to the Jews, right? And them wanting to know all about everything cut him into pieces? Why? Could it be that he felt – – – guilty?
@ John Wear:
It does now appear that this individual – with the moniker Concerned German – has a mind that is closed. This is not an attack on this person, but an observation based on his written comments. It is indeed difficult and at times painful to face that we have been lied to for decades with this holocaust narrative. It is very upsetting and some individuals will not want to seek out truth with an open mind.
But, to what purpose are these comments? Each of us ought to examine the sources, read them and reflect on them. I found the works of the revisionists to be more convincing because these were researched and written to a higher standard of evidence than the official propaganda narrative that we have all been fed ad nausium. All these “eye-witnesses”, whose testimonies do not withstand forensic scrutiny, can be summarily dismissed. For some persons, It comes down to what they wish to believe. Not all persons can be reached with the facts, sorry to say.
Why did we have to endure the sensationalistic and bizarre claims of soap being made out of Jewish fat, and lamp shades made from Jewish skin? Clearly absurd nonsense used for crude shock value.
The holocaust will not die an easy death because the Jews use it to deter and stifle any and all criticism of them and their actions.
Since Eichmann was invoked by Concerned German, let me add this. In Nora Levin’s 1968 lengthy tome published by Schocken Books, The Holocaust, the Destruction of European Jewry, 1933-1945, we find an alleged quote from him saying these 10 words, actually quoting what Reinhard Heydrich had allegedly told Eichmann in a closed door meeting: “The Fuhrer has ordered the physical extermination of the Jews.” (found on pages 290-291 of that book)
Yet, no order or plan was ever found that supports what this quote asserts. It is doubtful that Heydrich (died 1942) had ever said such a thing. Eichmann would say anything to save his skin. He failed and was hanged. If the Germans were hell bent on exterminating the Jews, why then all the efforts to save lives at the alleged death camps? Eichmann is not a credible witness for the official holocaust narrative.
LikeLiked by 3 people
@larryzb I can’t comment whether my mind is closed or not. However, I don’t talk about lamp shades or soap. I don’t even care if the surviving witnesses are credible or not. I talk about high-level officers admitting that the holocaust happened. Such as Höß who, according to John Wear, was “tortured” by getting access to a library in his Nürnberg prison and being submitted to unpleasant interviews. I guess his chair didn’t have a cushion.
Again: They said that they were ordered to plan the killing of millions of people, or they just remained silent (Richard Baer). Why didn’t they just assert that the crimes they were accused of never happened? Because they were afraid of a three-years prison sentence for holocaust denial?
LikeLiked by 2 people
@John Wear “Guilt can also manifest itself in different ways” If I compensate someone whose grandparents were killed by my grandparents, I admit my grandparents’ guilt, not mine. On the other hand, Haverbeck herself is guilty. Personally, I don’t think that one should be convicted for denying the holocaust, but frankly, if she has the energy at 90 years to continuously insult the memory of people killed for no other reason than being Jews, Gypsies or Poles, she is also strong enough to spend time in prison.
Reblogged this on World War 2 Truth.
LikeLiked by 2 people
From my experience as a strong website owner, it is obvious to me that “Concerned German” is not German but is an enemy jew.
The first clue is the self-chosen’s chosen moniker: Concerned German. Think about it. Which of us of German blood would call ourselves “Concerned German”?
And then comes the flood of more clues that provide sufficient evidence for conclusion: the “closed mind” that never learns but instead always comes back with an altered angle of attack, spewing the old lies along the way to help poison the minds of readers who haven’t yet overcome the jew methods of operation.
I didn’t let the jews poison my comments section. They have all their big media in which to spew their poison, and they have their hundreds (or more) pretend-pro-White sites on which to spew their poison. They should not have our sites, too.
I offer a selected archive of another great site no longer on the www:
LikeLiked by 4 people
As to references to other great sites, shameless self-promotion, eh?
What does it take to convince you, Concerned German?
If the forensic and documentary evidence contradict the testimonies, which do you give greater weight to? There are eye-witnesses (as in former camp inmates) that say there were no mass killings by any means.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on THE FOURTH REICH CENTURY.