Editor’s Comment: The MSM can print articles today stating “Why The German People Should Be Abolished”, they can label anyone they do not like a “Neo-Nazi” and yet they are now struggling with how to label the outspoken Dali Lama.
This week’s post gives an insight into the tangled web of hysteria they have weaved for themselves over many decades. An examination of the establishment’s WWII narrative is increasingly relevant to our lives today. Perhaps that is why it is so heavily guarded and protected by legislation, threats, intimidation and violence against anyone who asks for objective forensic examination of the evidence. Even the most vulnerable in our society, our elderly people, are terrorized for asking the wrong questions.
The Nuremberg Trials
After Germany’s defeat in WWII, the Nuremberg and later trials were organized primarily for political purposes rather than to dispense impartial justice. Wears War brings to you each week a quote from the many fine men and women who were openly appalled by the trials. All of these people were highly respected and prominent in their field, at least until they spoke out against the trials.
Joseph Halow, a young U.S. court reporter at the Dachau trials in 1947, described some of the false witnesses at the Dachau trials:
“…the major portion of the witnesses for the prosecution in the concentration-camp cases were what came to be known as “professional witnesses,” and everyone working at Dachau regarded them as such. “Professional,” since they were paid for each day they testified. In addition, they were provided free housing and food, at a time when these were often difficult to come by in Germany. Some of them stayed in Dachau for months, testifying in every one of the concentration-camp cases. In other words, these witnesses made their living testifying for the prosecution. Usually, they were former inmates from the camps, and their strong hatred of the Germans should, at the very least, have called their testimony into question.”[i]
[i] Halow, Joseph, Innocent at Dachau, Newport Beach, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1992, p. 61.

Joseph Halow’s observations about the questionable testimony of “professional witnesses” are not unique. As we have presented previously here and here, Carlos Porter examined the claims of these witnesses, the evidence and proceedings. As Karl Brecht noted in his review of Porter’s book Not Guilty at Nuremberg: The German Defense Case:
Normal rules of evidence were suspended and affidavits of “witnesses” were not allowed to be cross examined. The prosecution presented as evidence numerous documents which were such absurdly bad forgeries that they were disallowed by their own judges out of sheer embarrassment. Both the American judge, Biddle, and the Russian judge, Nikitchenko, made statements prior to the trial to the effect that the defendants had already been convicted. The press was invited to watch the proceedings and the trial was broadcast over the radio. It lasted nearly a year and for entertainment value it outdid the Circus Maximus and the games of the Roman Colosseum combined. It was the political show trial of the century, making the 1930’s purge trials of Stalin seem like the epitome of just law.
Carl Porter Examines The Claims Of The ‘Professional Witnesses’:
Many defenders of the Holocaust story maintain that the 42-volume Trial of the Major War Criminals (The Blue Series) supplies a massive compilation of damning evidence against Germany’s National Socialist regime. In his book Made in Russia: The Holocaust, Carlos Porter confronts the evidence directly by reproducing page after page from the Blue Series. Porter shows that many of the charges made at Nuremberg are so bizarre that most defenders of the Holocaust story have long since let them lapse. In addition to killing Jews in homicidal gas chambers, the Germans at Nuremberg were accused of:
–building special electrical appliances to zap inmates to death with mass electrical shocks;
–killing 20,000 Jews in a village near Auschwitz with an atomic bomb;
–forcing prisoners to climb trees and then killing the prisoners by cutting down the trees;
–killing 840,000 Russian prisoners at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp using a pedal-driven brain-bashing machine, and then burning the bodies in four mobile crematories;
–torturing and executing people at the Yanov camp in Russia in time to music created by a special orchestra selected from among the prisoners, and then shooting every member of the orchestra;
—grinding the bones of 200 people at one time as described in documents and photographs that have disappeared;
—making lampshades, handbags, driving gloves for SS officers, book bindings, saddles, house slippers, etc. out of human skin;
–killing prisoners and concentration camp inmates for everything from having soiled underwear to having armpit hair; and
—steaming people to death like lobsters in steam chambers at Treblinka.
After this incredible survey of Nuremberg atrocity evidence, Carlos Porter provides numerous examples of improper prosecution tactics at Nuremberg. The defendants at Nuremberg were rarely able to confront their accusers, since affidavits from witnesses who had been deposed months before sufficed. The prosecution made it difficult for the defense lawyers to have timely access to the documents introduced into evidence by the prosecution. Also, photocopies and transcripts were usually submitted into evidence instead of the original German documents, which in many cases seemed to have disappeared. Finally, the defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case. The defense had no right to review the tons of remaining documents that might help them defend their clients.
Quote Source: Porter, Carlos Whitlock, Made in Russia: The Holocaust, Historical Review Press, 1988.




Yes, we observe that it was just these ridiculous and absurd claims (noted and cited above) that caused some individuals to look with more scrutiny at the official holocaust yarn back in the 1970s (Butz’ work is a prime example).
Allow me to briefly quote from Dr. Thomas Dalton’s 2014 book, The Holocaust – An Introduction: Exploring the Evidence (Castle Hill Publishers):
“The real danger of Holocaust revisionism is this: It may cause people to contemplate a society not dominated by Jews. This, after all, is what Hitler sought – a Germany free of Jews. . . . . When the Jews were driven out, German economy, culture, civic life, and national spirit all flourished to a remarkable and unprecedented degree. If other peoples around the world understood this, they too might seek to regain control of their national lives.” (page 114, available from The Barnes Review book club).
That is why the holocaust narrative must be maintained at all costs. And, that is why we honest, decent, truth seekers must continue fighting the good fight to inform more citizens of the fraud of the holocaust. (Sadly, it must be said that in the US, Zionized Christians cannot be reached with the facts.)
The truth is that the Germans (in the 1930s) were achieving a national revival that shamed the failed economic and social experiments in the Allied nations. FDR’s New Deal and the murderous collectivization in the Soviet Union were abysmal failures! What a tragedy for the world destroying Germany was (as well, it was a terrible crime!). The Germans had much to offer the world in what they were achieving, and as an example on how a people could take back control of their national culture.
As the Jews cannot reform themselves and cannot live in any host society without constantly attempting to subvert that host society. the only solution to the Jewish problem is expulsion and resettlement. If that is “anti-Semitism”, then I say such anti-Semitism is needed for the survival of the peoples of the world. (Let me add that I am deeply resentful as an American that the Jews have too damn much influence over all aspects of our lives here in the US.)
LikeLiked by 4 people
“The Germans had much to offer the world in what they were achieving, and as an example on how a people could take back control of their national culture.”
Which is the very reason Germany had to be annihilated by the Rothschild centred Zionist World Dictatorship. And this is admitted by many powerful leaders from all sides, such as:
1) Bernard Lecache, President of the World Jewish League said in 1932 (BEFORE Hitler came to power!):
“GERMANY IS OUR PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE. IT IS OUR OBJECT TO DECLARE WAR WITHOUT MERCY AGAINST HER”
2) ‘Ashamed and Humiliated’, The British Attorney General Sir Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16/84 (AP)
“Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal……I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. BUT WE, (England), DECLARED WAR ON GERMANY,INTENT ON DESTROYING IT, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the (Jewish) ‘Americans’ around Roosevelt.
We ignored Hitler’s pleading, not to enter into war.Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire.
I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentlessly pursued now, only under a different label.”
3) Head of British Psychological Warfare Executive (Propaganda), Victor Cavendish-Bentick in a hand written note, wrote on Aug 27th, 1943:
“We have had a good run for our money with this gas chamber story we have been putting about, but don’t we run the risk eventually we are going to be FOUND OUT AND WHEN WE ARE FOUND OUT THE COLLAPSE OF THAT LIE is going to bring the whole of our psychological warfare with it? So isn’t it rather time now to let it drift off by itself and concentrate on other lines that we are running.”
In Public Record Office Document F0371/34551 (I got this information from the book “Inside the South African Reserve Bank” by Stephen Mitford Goodson, RIP. He paid the ultimate price)
3) “Whereas the Jews around him take it for granted that the goyim on whom they depend for economic, military, and diplomatic support are too stupid ever to figure out what the Jews think about them and say about them behind their backs and plan to do to them when they can, and too sheeplike ever to take effective action if they do figure it out, he worries.
He remembers that the Romans figured it out, and they consequently sacked Jerusalem and ended their cult in Palestine. He remembers that the Germans figured it out, and that’s why he became an involuntary tenant in a concentration camp. He’s worried that if his fellow Jews continue behaving as they always have, they will get themselves into some really serious trouble — again.”
Israel Shahak Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3,000 Years
4) Referring to WW 1:
“Full Responsibility for the First World War, lies squarely on the shoulders of the International Jewish Bankers. They are responsible for Millions of dead and dying.”
US. Congress-Record 67th Congress, 4. Sitting, Senate Document No 346
AND TODAY the War of Genocide Against Germany continues (now expanded out to all ethnic-Europeans).
5) “LET THE WORLD KNOW GERMANY IS GOING DOWN”
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=141387
“…..The present situation in Germany gives proof that some secret community has decided to eliminate Germany and it’s culture. Germans are becoming rightless and abandoned people in their own country, and this is most probably a fact which will never be told in the evening news broadcasted in the rest of the world.
It’s a big showdown going on, the governments of our neighbor countries claim not to understand anything of what the German government has started to manifest – the suicide of the German nation…..”
6) http://newobserveronline.com/world-jewish-congress-and-official-german-jewry-welcomes-nonwhite-invasion/
“…The World Jewish Congress and the Central Council of Jews in Germany have issued a formal statement welcoming the nonwhite invasion of Germany, calling it the “right thing” and an “evolution towards an open society.”
At the same time, of course, both Jewish organizations back Israel, which has a Jews-only immigration policy and which checks potential immigrants to see if they have Jewish DNA……”
HOW CAN THIS BE? WHO IS BEHIND ALL THIS REALLY?:
7) “World events do not occur by accident. They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse string.” (Denis Healey, former British Secretary of Defense.)
8) “Political Zionism is an agency of Big Business. It is being used by Jewish and Christian financiers in this country and Great Britain, to make Jews believe that Palestine will be ruled by a descendant of King David who will ultimately rule the world.
What delusion! It will lead to war between Arabs and Jews and eventually to war between Muslims and non-Muslims. That will be the turning point of history.” (Henry H. Klein, “A Jew Warns Jews,” 1947)
LikeLiked by 3 people
““Full Responsibility for the First World War, lies squarely on the shoulders of the International Jewish Bankers. They are responsible for Millions of dead and dying.””
No, we cannot abide this simplistic explanation for the cause of World War One. Russia mobilized after the prodding by France to do so. Both powers coveted lands currently possessed by Germany and Austria-Hungary. This mobilization effectively forced Germany to declare war on Russia (as all notable military historians agree that Germany could ill afford any delays in attempting to defend herself from the millions of men that Russia could put into the field). And, Austria was hell bent on punishing Serbia over the assassination. The Kaiser when he realized how this was playing out acted quickly in late July, 2014 to avoid war, but events spun out of control.
Let me add that despite the Russian Orthodox Church making Tsar Nicholas II a saint after the fall of the Soviet Union (early 1990s), the last Tsar bears much culpability for the outbreak of the war. Kaiser Wilhelm sent a telegram begging him to not mobilize, and the Tsar was moved and called off the order to mobilize the Russian armed forces. But, the very next day, the weak (little strength of character or personality in this tsar) Nicholas caved into the demands of the war party in his government, and ordered the mobilization to go forward. Sadly, what ought to have been a local conflict confined to the Balkans, blew up into a world war that did kill millions.
That said, the conniving of the British and the Jews brought the US into the war after the status quo peace proposals put forward by Germany at the end of 1916 were rejected by the British. The US entry into the war led to the unjust peace and the rest is history as they say. Wilson was moving in his thinking (there are indications of this in his meetings with his cabinet officials in 1916 prior to the presidential election that year) towards bringing the US into the war on the side of Britain. Wilson was a passionate Anglophile. Let us not overlook that Britain had come to the US for help in financing its war making, and the US banks, and then the US Treasury had obliged them. Thus, by 1917, the US did not want a defeat and thus, a default by Britain.
So, yes, the Jews prolonged the war to a terrible ending, but they do not bear full responsibility for the outbreak of it. And, as always, they had vainglorious useful idiots to help them in their damnable schemes.
We must observe that Woody would never have become president except for the fact that it was a 3 way race in 2012 (with Taft and Teddy Roosevelt). Wilson only received a plurality (about 40 per cent) of the popular vote, not a majority. The other 2 candidates respected the Constitution more than Wilson did.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Re who started WWI, point taken larryzb. Good info you provide.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Are you going to believe my imagination or your lying, fucking eyes?”
LikeLike
Make your point without resorting to foul language here or go to youtube or Zio Hedge to make your comments instead should you enjoy such crassness. You did not even elaborate on any point in fact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As a matter of fact, I did “elaborate on any point in fact.” I was commenting on the fool expecting people to believe his IMAGINATION, concerning the holocaust, to prove that it really happened.
LikeLiked by 1 person