Many fine men and women of various nationalities and professions, including senior military personnel, were openly appalled by the dispensation of normal military and/or criminal evidentiary processes expected in a trial. These people were highly respected and prominent in their field, at least until they spoke out against the Nuremberg trials. Their objections are increasingly relevant today.
American attorney Warren Magee, who served as defense counsel in the Ministries Trial:
“An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” is the driving force behind the prosecutions at Nuremberg. While it grieves me to say this, the prosecution staff, its lawyers, research analysts, interpreters, clerks, etc. is largely Jewish. Many are Germans who fled their country and only recently took out American citizenship. Jewish influence was even apparent at the first trial, labeled the IMT. Atrocities against Jews are always stressed above all else…
With persecuted Jews in the background directing the proceedings, the trials cannot be maintained in an objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, personal grievances, and racial desires for revenge…
Basic principles have been disregarded by “new” Americans, many of whom have embedded in their very beings European racial hatreds and prejudices.[i]
[i] Remy, Steven P., The Malmedy Massacre: The War Crimes Trial Controversy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017, p. 134.
Over-representation continues in America today. Were the Nuremberg trials a major leap forward in political expediency overriding the American Constitution?
The following video is 10 minutes. The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. Scholars of the American Constitution may be able to advise where in the Constitution these actions are permitted:
WEARS WAR has moved to a new website! 
Wow! I will try to be brief here in my remarks. From the various captions to the pictures above:
First, many people are coming to see that it is not so much that Israel is a colony of the US in the Middle East but that rather the US has become a colony of Israel as its (US) foreign policy and increasingly its domestic policies serve Jewish interests.
Second, there was one US president that was opposing the Jewish interests and their schemes. He was violently killed in Dallas in November, 1963.
Third, once a person becomes “Jew-aware” or “Jew-wise” there is no going back to a blissful state of ignorance. Such a person sees that Jews are impacting every dimension of society and cultural life in the US (education, government policies (even those achieved via undemocratic means as by judicial fiat or diktat), entertainment, control of news media (print, TV, radio, and increasingly via the Internet), control of book publishing, influencing art and music, etc.) The national life must conform to what the Jews demand it to be, even though Jews make up only about 2 1/2 percent of the population (that is 25 people out of every one thousand citizens)! What chutzpah!!
What does that remind you of? Weimar Germany in the 1920s.
A final thought is what Herve Ryssen concludes his 2012 book, Understanding the Jews, Understanding Anti-Semitism, with: Judaism is a crime against humanity.
If Jews were like most other ethnic minorities, they would not be incessantly working to fundamentally and drastically alter the host societies in which they live. And, life would be much better for the rest of us.
LikeLiked by 3 people
People interested in this topic should also look at the final plea of the defense counsel in relation to charges in the Nordhausen and Dora concentration camps.
https://codoh.com/library/document/2321/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Reblogged this on THE FOURTH REICH CENTURY and commented:
DOWN WITH THE JEW STICE.
LikeLike